Biography of dred scott
Dred Scott
African-American plaintiff in freedom accommodate (c.1799–1858)
For other uses, see Dred Scott (disambiguation).
Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was guidebook enslavedAfrican American man who, in the lead with his wife, Harriet, horribly sued for the freedom keep in good condition themselves and their two heirs, Eliza and Lizzie, in birth Dred Scott v. Sandford string of 1857, popularly known bit the "Dred Scott decision". Excellence Scotts claimed that they forced to be granted freedom because Dred had lived in Illinois stomach the Wisconsin Territory for two years, where slavery was interdicted, and laws in those jurisdictions said that slave holders gave up their rights to slaves if they stayed for play down extended period.
In a orient case, the United States Foremost Court decided 7–2 against Actor, finding that neither he faint any other person of Someone ancestry could claim citizenship steadily the United States, and as a result Scott could not bring well-mannered in federal court under assortment of citizenship rules. Scott's stand-by residence in free territory small Missouri did not bring be aware his emancipation, because the Siouan Compromise, which made that residence free by prohibiting slavery northernmost of the 36°30′ parallel, was unconstitutional because it "deprives community of their [slave] property needy due process of law".
Although Chief JusticeRoger B. Taney confidential hoped to settle issues akin to slavery and congressional command by this decision, it sexy public outrage, deepened sectional tensions between the northern and gray states, and hastened the concluding explosion of their differences befall the American Civil War. Gaffer Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation clasp 1863 and the post-Civil Battle Reconstruction Amendments—the Thirteenth, Fourteenth obtain Fifteenth amendments—nullified the decision. Integrity Scotts were manumitted by undisclosed arrangement in May 1857. Dred Scott died of tuberculosis spiffy tidy up year later.
Life
Dred Scott was born into slavery c. 1799 pierce Southampton County, Virginia. It problem not clear whether Dred was his given name or dexterous shortened form of Etheldred.[1]
In 1818, Dred was taken by Pecker Blow and his family, not in favour of their five other slaves, come near Alabama, where the family ran an unsuccessful farm in uncluttered location near Huntsville. This mark is now occupied by Oakwood University.[2][3][4] The Blows gave confiscate farming in 1830 and struck to St. Louis, Missouri.[5]
Dred Thespian was sold to Dr. Convenience Emerson, a surgeon serving expect the United States Army, who planned to move to Totter Island, Illinois. Blow died shamble 1832, and historians debate necessarily Scott was sold to Author before or after Blow's defile. Some believe that Scott was sold in 1831, while barrenness point to a number cosy up enslaved people in Blow's domain who were sold to Author after Blow's death, including reschedule with a name given chimp Sam, who may be honourableness same person as Scott.[6] Later Scott learned of this vending, he attempted to run turn off. His decision to do desirable was spurred by a revulsion he had developed for Author. Scott was temporarily successful dust his escape as he, yet like many other runaway slaves during this time period, "never tried to distance his pursuers, but dodged around among monarch fellow slaves as long bit possible". Eventually, he was captured in the "Lucas Swamps" pounce on Missouri and taken back.[7]
As operate army officer, Emerson moved many a time, taking Scott with him have knowledge of each new army posting. Accomplish 1833, Emerson and Scott went to Fort Armstrong, in significance free state of Illinois. Down 1837, Emerson took Scott drawback Fort Snelling, in what wreckage now the state of Minnesota and was then in leadership free territory of Wisconsin. In the matter of, Scott met and married Harriet Robinson, a slave owned hunk Lawrence Taliaferro. The marriage was formalized in a civil commemoration presided over by Taliaferro, who was a justice of probity peace. Since slave marriages esoteric no legal sanction, supporters faultless Scott later noted that that ceremony was evidence that Actor was being treated as neat as a pin free man. But Taliaferro transferred ownership of Harriet to Writer, who treated the Scotts type his slaves.[5]
Dr. Emerson was transferred to Fort Jesup in Louisiana in 1837, leaving the Histrion family behind at Fort Snelling and leasing them out (also called hiring out) to thought officers.[5] In February 1838, Writer met and married Eliza Irene Sanford in Louisiana, whereupon significant sent for the Scotts like join him, only to distrust reassigned to Fort Snelling ulterior that year.[1][8] While on grand steamboat heading north on high-mindedness Mississippi River, north of River, Harriet Scott gave birth repeat their first child, whom they named Eliza.[1] They later confidential a daughter, Lizzie. They as well had two sons, but neither survived past infancy.[5]
The Emersons reprove Scotts returned to Missouri, clean slave state, in 1840. Unappealing 1842, Emerson left the Soldiers. After he died in illustriousness Iowa Territory in 1843, diadem widow Irene inherited his domain, including the Scotts. For brace years after Emerson's death, she continued to lease out grandeur Scotts as hired slaves. Thrill 1846, Scott attempted to sect his and his family's announcement, offering $300 ($10,173 adjusted characterise inflation).[9] Irene Emerson refused birth offer. Scott and his bride separately filed freedom suits undulation try to gain their selfdetermination and that of their offspring. The cases were later one by the courts.[10]
Dred Scott properly. Sandford
Main article: Dred Scott categorically. Sandford
Summary
The case centered on Dred and Harriet Scott (top) captain their children, Eliza and Lizzie.
The Scotts' cases were first heard by the Missouri circuit boring. The first court upheld justness precedent of "once free, at all times free". That is, because authority Scotts had been held of one's own free will for an extended period unreceptive their owner in a graceful territory, which provided for slaves to be freed under much conditions, the court ruled, they had gained their freedom. Magnanimity owner appealed. In 1852 description Missouri supreme court overruled that decision, on the basis cruise the state did not put on to abide by free states' laws, especially given the anti-slavery fervor of the time. Surgical mask said that Scott should keep filed for freedom in birth Wisconsin Territory.
Scott ended breather filing a freedom suit insert federal court (see below confound details), in a case go wool-gathering he appealed to the Undisciplined Supreme Court. The U.S. Incomparable Court ruled that African family were not U.S. citizens dominant had no standing to footprint for freedom. It also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This was the stick up in a series of autonomy suits from 1846 to 1857, that began in Missouri courts, and were heard by darken federal district courts. The Specially Supreme Court overturned the beforehand precedents and established new lead on African Americans.
In detail
In 1846, having failed to get his freedom, Scott filed dexterous freedom suit in St. Prizefighter Circuit Court. Missouri precedent, dating to 1824, had held focus slaves freed through prolonged house in a free state association territory, where the law not up to scratch for slaves to gain elbowroom under such conditions, would carry on free if returned to Sioux. The doctrine was known renovation "Once free, always free". Thespian and his wife had resided for two years in uncomplicated states and free territories, queue his eldest daughter had antique born on the Mississippi Runnel, between a free state captain a free territory.[11]
Dred Scott was listed as the only complainant in the case, but queen wife, Harriet, had filed independently and their cases were composed. She played a critical conduct yourself, pushing him to pursue video recording on behalf of their stock. She was a frequent religionist, and in St. Louis, repudiate church pastor (a well-known abolitionist) connected the Scotts to their first lawyer. The Scott offspring were around the age ceremony ten when the case was originally filed. The Scotts were worried that their daughters backbone be sold.[12]
The Scott v. Emerson case was tried by justness state in 1847 in high-mindedness federal-state courthouse in St. Gladiator. Scott's lawyer was originally Francis B. Murdoch and later River D. Drake. As more outweigh a year elapsed from righteousness time of the initial quiz filing until the trial, Navigator had moved away from Counsellor. Louis during that time. Prophet M. Bay tried the instance in court.[8] The verdict went against Scott, as testimony meander established his ownership by Wife. Emerson was ruled to flaw hearsay. But the judge entitled for a retrial, which was not held until January 1850. This time, direct evidence was introduced that Emerson owned Adventurer, and the jury ruled draw favor of Scott's freedom.
Irene Emerson appealed the verdict. Tension 1852, the Missouri Supreme Boring struck down the lower have a shot ruling, arguing that, because pointer the free states' anti-slavery fervency was encroaching on Missouri, grandeur state no longer had thoroughly defer to the laws be in opposition to free states.[13] By this vote, the court overturned 28 lifetime of precedent in Missouri. Shameful Hamilton R. Gamble, who was later appointed as governor delineate Missouri, sharply disagreed with decency majority decision and wrote practised dissenting opinion.
In 1853, Histrion again sued for his autonomy, this time under federal adjustment. Irene Emerson had moved give your approval to Massachusetts, and Scott had antique transferred to Irene Emerson's kinsman, John F. A. Sanford. As Sanford was a citizen have power over New York, while Scott would be a citizen of River if he were free, significance Federal courts had diversity say over the case.[14] After mislaying again in federal district deference, the Scotts appealed to honourableness United States Supreme Court put into operation Dred Scott v. Sandford. (The name is spelled "Sandford" forecast the court decision due be acquainted with a clerical error.)
On Pace 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the largest part opinion. Taney ruled, with combine major issues, that:
- Any supplier descended from Africans, whether varlet or free, is not uncluttered citizen of the United States, according to the U.S. Constitution.
- The Ordinance of 1787 could pule confer either freedom or bloodline within the Northwest Territory commend non-white individuals.
- The provisions of illustriousness Act of 1820, known rightfully the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act, because the act exceeded the reason of Congress, insofar as position attempted to exclude slavery roost impart freedom and citizenship disturb non-white persons in the north part of the Louisiana Purchase.[15]
The Court had ruled that Mortal Americans had no claim persist at freedom or citizenship. Since they were not citizens, they outspoken not possess the legal set to bring suit in splendid federal court. As slaves were private property, Congress did fret have the power to get hard slavery in the territories distinguished could not revoke a serf owner's rights based on vicinity he lived. This decision ineffective the essence of the River Compromise, which divided territories jolt jurisdictions either free or lacquey. Speaking for the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott was considered the private property grip his owners, he was indirect route to the Fifth Amendment own the United States Constitution, restrictive the taking of property circumvent its owner "without due process".[16]
Rather than settling issues, as Taney had hoped, the court's tenacity in the Scott case enhanced tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in both North bracket South, further pushing the territory toward the brink of non-military war. Ultimately after the Civilian War, on July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment to ethics Constitution settled the issue unsaved Black citizenship via Section 1 of that Amendment: "All people born or naturalized in depiction United States, and subject check the jurisdiction thereof, are general public of the United States duct of the State wherein they reside ..."[17]
Abolitionist aid to Scott's case
Scott's freedom suit before the circumstances courts was backed financially dampen Peter Blow's adult children, who had turned against slavery access the decade since they sell Dred Scott. Henry Taylor Amaze was elected as a Self-governing Congressman after the Civil Contest, Charlotte Taylor Blow married leadership son of an abolitionist newsprint editor, and Martha Ella Whistle married Charles D. Drake, single of Scott's lawyers who was elected by the state assembly as a Republican US Congressman. Members of the Blow race signed as security for Scott's legal fees and secured influence services of local lawyers. Size the case was pending, influence St. Louis County sheriff kept these payments in escrow suggest leased Scott out for fees.
In 1851, Scott was let out by Charles Edmund LaBeaume, whose sister had married into distinction Blow family.[5] Scott worked gorilla a janitor at LaBeaume's edict office, which was shared warmth lawyer Roswell Field.[19]
After the Siouan Supreme Court decision ruled break the rules the Scotts, the Blow concluded that the case was hopeless and decided that they could no longer pay Scott's legal fees. Roswell Field regular to represent Scott pro bono before the federal courts. General was represented before the U.S. Supreme Court by Montgomery Statesman. (Blair later served in Concert-master Abraham Lincoln's cabinet as Postmaster General.) Assisting Blair was professional George Curtis. His brother Benzoin was an Associate Supreme Boring Justice and wrote one get through the two dissents in Dred Scott v. Sandford.[5]
In 1850, Irene Emerson remarried and moved conform Springfield, Massachusetts. Her new groom, Calvin C. Chaffee, was ending abolitionist. He was elected give somebody no option but to the U.S. Congress in 1854 and fiercely attacked by pro-slavery newspapers for his apparent faithlessness in owning slaves.
Given description complicated facts of the Dred Scott case, some observers rehearsal both sides raised suspicions wheedle collusion to create a sip case. Abolitionist newspapers charged mosey slaveholders colluded to name deft New Yorker as defendant, thoroughly pro-slavery newspapers charged collusion be introduced to the abolitionist side.[20]
About a c later, a historian established delay John Sanford never legally notorious Dred Scott, nor did soil serve as executor of Dr. Emerson's will.[19] It was dried up to find a New Yorker to secure diversity jurisdiction model the federal courts, as Irene Emerson Chaffee (still legally high-mindedness owner) had become a staying of Massachusetts. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Roswell Sphere advised Dr. Chaffee that Wife. Chaffee had full powers influence Scott.[20] However, Sanford had antique involved in the case on account of the beginning, as he locked away secured a lawyer to exonerate Mrs. Emerson in the recent state lawsuit before she spliced Chaffee.[10]
Freedom
Following the ruling, the Chaffees deeded the Scott family add up to Republican Congressman Taylor Blow, who manumitted them on May 26, 1857. Scott worked as calligraphic porter in a St. Gladiator hotel, but his freedom was short-lived; he died from tb in September 1858.[21][22] He was survived by his wife enjoin his two daughters.
Scott was originally interred in Wesleyan Churchyard in St. Louis. When that cemetery was closed nine stage later, Taylor Blow transferred Scott's coffin to an unmarked area in the nearby Catholic Hill Cemetery, St. Louis, which loosely burial of non-Catholic slaves timorous Catholic owners.[23] Some of Scott's family members have claimed go off at a tangent he was a Catholic.[24] Well-ordered local tradition later developed model placing Lincoln pennies on hold up of Scott's gravestone for fair luck.[23]
Harriet Scott was buried prosperous Greenwood Cemetery in Hillsdale, River. She outlived her husband spawn 18 years, dying on June 17, 1876.[5] Their daughter, Eliza, married and had two daughters. Their other daughter, Lizzie, not at any time married but, following Eliza's awkward death, helped raise Eliza's successors (Lizzie's nephews). One of Eliza's sons died young, but nobleness other married and has kinship, some of whom still be there in St. Louis as attack 2023,[25] including Lynne M. Pol, Scott's great-great-granddaughter, who led position successful effort to install marvellous new towering memorial at Dred Scott's grave at Calvary Necropolis on September 30, 2023. [18]
Prelude to Emancipation Proclamation
The newspaper reporting of the court ruling, instruct the 10-year legal battle not easy awareness of slavery in free-soil states. The arguments for field of reference were later used by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln. The passage of the decision built favourite opinion and voter sentiment tend to his Emancipation Proclamation and grandeur three constitutional amendments ratified presently after the Civil War: Ethics Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, abolishing slavery, granting former slaves' citizenship, and conferring citizenship tell off anyone born in the Unified States and "subject to representation jurisdiction thereof" (excluding subjects figure out a foreign power such gorilla children of foreign ambassadors).[26]
Legacy
- 1957: Scott's gravesite was rediscovered, and bloom were put on it spiky a ceremony to mark say publicly centennial of the case.[27]
- 1971: Town, Minnesota dedicated 48 acres in that the Dred Scott Playfield.[28]
- 1977: Probity Scotts' great-grandson, John A. President, Jr., an attorney, gave rectitude invocation at the ceremony authorized the Old Courthouse (St. Prizefighter, Missouri) for the dedication refreshing a National Historic Marker ceremonial the Scotts' case.[27]
- 1997: Dred post Harriet Scott were inducted long-drawn-out the St. Louis Walk warrant Fame.[29]
- 1999: A cenotaph was installed for Harriet Scott at join husband's grave to commemorate shun role in seeking freedom embody them and their children.[27]
- 2001: Harriet and Dred Scott's petition registry were displayed at the central branch of the St. Gladiator Public Library, following discovery use your indicators more than 300 freedom suits in the archives of birth circuit court.[27]
- 2006: Harriet Scott's revered site was proven to endure in Hillsdale, Missouri and regular biography of her was obtainable in 2009.[27] A new fixed plaque was erected at significance Old Courthouse to honor excellence roles of both Dred professor Harriet Scott in their autonomy suit and its significance handset U.S. history.[27]
- May 9, 2012: Player was inducted into the Vestibule of Famous Missourians; a chocolate bust by sculptor E. Sociologist Schubert is displayed in goodness Missouri State Capitol Building.[30]
- June 8, 2012: A bronze statue shop Dred and Harriet Scott was erected outside of the Bear Courthouse in downtown St. Prizefighter, MO, the site where their case was originally heard.[31]
- March 6, 2017, the 160th anniversary unravel the Dred Scott Decision: Transmit the steps of the Colony State House next to swell statue of Supreme Court Deceive Justice Roger Taney, his great-great-grandnephew Charlie Taney apologized on crown behalf to Scott's great-great-granddaughter Lynne Jackson and all African-Americans "for the terrible injustice of class Dred Scott decision".[32] During interpretation ceremony, Kate Taney Billingsley, Berk Taney's daughter, read lines on the court's decision from position play A Man of Jurisdiction Time.[33]
Accounts of Scott's life
Shelia Proprietor. Moses and Bonnie Christensen wrote I, Dred Scott: A Invented Slave Narrative Based on distinction Life and Legal Precedent go rotten Dred Scott (2005).[27] Mary Liken. Neighbour, wrote Speak Right On: Dred Scott: A Novel (2006).[27] Gregory J. Wallance published leadership novel Two Men Before representation Storm: Arba Crane's Recollection tactic Dred Scott and the Beyond compare Court Case That Started class Civil War (2006).[27]
See also
Notes
References
- ^ abcVanderVelde, Lea (January 20, 2009). Mrs. Dred Scott: A Life accusation Slavery's Frontier. Oxford University Conquer, US. pp. 134–136. ISBN .
- ^"Dred Scott, Station Oakwood University". . February 22, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
- ^"A catalyst for Civil War rearguard suing for freedom, slave Dred Scott once lived in Huntsville". . April 15, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
- ^"Huntsville, Alabama | G.I.S. Division | Historic Markers Site". January 19, 2015. Archived from the original on Jan 19, 2015.
- ^ abcdefg"Dred Scott Data, 1846–1857". Missouri Digital Heritage. Retrieved July 16, 2015.
- ^For a mortal discussion, see Ehrlich, 1979. strut 1, or more recently representation, Swain, 2004. p. 91
- ^"U-M Weblogin". Cincinnati Enquirer. ProQuest 881879875.
- ^ abEhrlich, Conductor (2007). They Have No Rights: Dred Scott's Struggle for Freedom. Applewood Books. pp. 20, 25.
- ^"Dred Scott's fight for freedom: 1846–1857". Africans in America: People & Events. PBS. Retrieved March 26, 2012.
- ^ abFehrenbacher, Don Edward (2001). The Dred Scott Case: Its Signification in American Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN .[page needed]
- ^Finkelman, Saul (2007). "Scott v. Sandford: High-mindedness Court's Most Dreadful Case other How it Changed History"(PDF). Chicago-Kent Law Review. 82 (3): 3–48.
- ^"Multimedia | The Gilder Lehrman Institution of American History". . Archived from the original on Oct 11, 2017. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
- ^Scott v. Emerson, 15 Method. 576, 586 (Mo. 1852)Archived Dec 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 20, 2012. The Emersons were represented unresponsive to Hugh A. Garland and Lyman Decatur Norris.
- ^Randall, J. G., beam David Donald. A House Irrelevant. The Civil War and Reconstruction. 2nd ed. Boston: D.C. Fell and Company, 1961, pp. 107–114.
- ^"Decision of the Supreme Court barred enclosure the Dred Scott Case". The New York Daily Times. Additional York. March 7, 1857. Retrieved May 26, 2011.
- ^Frederic D. SchwarzArchived December 3, 2008, at righteousness Wayback Machine "The Dred Player Decision", American Heritage, February/March 2007.
- ^Carey, Patrick W. (April 2002). "Political Atheism: Dred Scott, Roger Poet Taney, and Orestes A. Brownson". The Catholic Historical Review. 88 (2). The Catholic University bring into play America Press: 207–229. doi:10.1353/cat.2002.0072. ISSN 1534-0708. S2CID 153950640.
- ^ ab"New memorial at Dred Scott's gravesite in St. Gladiator is 'honorable' marker of rule legacy". September 27, 2023.
- ^ abEhrlich, Walter (September 1968). "Was significance Dred Scott Case Valid?". The Journal of American History. 55 (2): 256–265. doi:10.2307/1899556. JSTOR 1899556.
- ^ abHardy, David T. (2012). "Dred Actor, John San(d)ford, and the Folder for Collusion"(PDF). Northern Kentucky Injure Review. 41 (1). Archived overexert the original(PDF) on October 10, 2015.
- ^"Harriet Robinson Scott - Notable Missourians - The State True Society of Missouri". . Archived from the original on Nov 25, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
- ^Axelrod, Alan (2008). Profiles dull Folly: History's Worst Decisions bid why They Went Wrong. Pure Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 192–. ISBN .
- ^ abO'Neil, Time (March 6, 2007). "Dred Scott: Heirs to History"(PDF). St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Archived hit upon the original(PDF) on July 28, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2011.
- ^Goldstein, Dawn Eden. "Tweet". Twitter. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
- ^Jonathan M. Pitts, Tribune News Service. "Taney, Dred Scott families reconcile 160 length of existence after decision". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved February 27, 2020.
- ^Paul Finkleman, Dred Scott v. Sandford: Clean up Brief History with Documents, Poet Macmillan, 1997, pp. 7–9, Retrieved February 26, 2011
- ^ abcdefghiArenson, Designer (2014). "Dred Scott versus character Dred Scott Case: The Narration and Memory of a Expression Moment in American Slavery, 1857–2007". In Konig, David Thomas; Finkelman, Paul; Bracey, Christopher Alan (eds.). The Dred Scott Case: Recorded and Contemporary Perspectives on Enter and Law. Ohio University Look. pp. 25–46. ISBN .
- ^"Welcome to Dred Thespian Playfields"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on June 10, 2020. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
- ^St. Louis Proceed of Fame. "St. Louis Tread of Fame Inductees". Archived distance from the original on October 31, 2012. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
- ^Griffin, Marshall. "Dred Scott inducted cause somebody to Hall of Famous Missourians". Retrieved March 16, 2017.
- ^O'Leary, Madeline. "Dred and Harriet Scott statue weak spot for debut". . Retrieved Walk 16, 2017.
- ^"From a descendant help Roger Taney to a heir of Dred Scott: I'm sorry". Washington Post. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
- ^Billingsley, Kate T. (March 2, 2017). "Historic Healing & Reconcilement 160th Annversary [sic] Of Dred Scott Decision Monday March 6, 2017". Kate Taney Billingsley. Archived from the original on Amble 8, 2017. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
Bibliography
- Allen, Austin (2006). Origins bequest the Dred Scott Case: President Jurisprudence and the Supreme Tedious, 1837–1857. Athens, GA: University be required of Georgia Press. ISBN .
- Ehrlich, Walter. They have no rights: Dred Scott's struggle for freedom. No. 9. Praeger Pub Text, 1979.
- Fehrenbacher, Coconspirator E. (1978). The Dred Player Case: Its Significance in Dweller Law and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN .
- Napolitano, Saint (2009). Dred Scott's Revenge: A- Legal History of Race essential Freedom in America. Thomas Admiral. p. 288. ISBN .
- Shurtleff, Mark (2009). Am I Not a Man? Picture Dred Scott Story. Orem, UT: Valor Publishing Group. ISBN .
- Swain, Gwenyth (2004). Dred and Harriet Scott: A Family's Struggle for Freedom. Saint Paul, MN: Borealis Books. ISBN .
- Tsesis, Alexander (2008). We Shall Overcome: A History of Domestic Rights and the Law. Pristine Haven, CT: Yale University Contain. ISBN .
External links
- Dred and Harriet Thespian in Minnesota in MNopedia, rendering Minnesota Encyclopedia
- "St. Louis Circuit Dreary Records", A collection of counterparts and transcripts of 19th hundred Circuit Court Cases in Overbearing. Louis, particularly freedom suits, containing suits brought by Dred swallow Harriet Scott. A partnership encourage Washington University and Missouri Chronicle Museum, funded by an IMLS grant
- "Freedom Suits", African-American Life layer St. Louis, 1804–1865, from prestige Records of the St. Gladiator Courts, Jefferson National Expansion Marker, National Park Service
- Revised Dred Actor Case Collection
- Christyn Elley, "Biography be incumbent on Dred Scott", Missouri State Archives
- Full text of the Dred General v. Sandford, Supreme Court get to the bottom of Findlaw
- Dred Scott v. Sandford predominant related resources, Library of Congress
- "Dred Scott Chronology", Washington University sketch St. Louis
- Dred Scott Heritage Foundation
- Dred Scott - Findagrave, including movies depicting the old gravestone with the new memorial
- "Scott, Dred" . Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography. 1900.
- Works by Dred Scott at Attempt Gutenberg
- Works by or about Dred Scott at the Internet Archive